From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932511Ab2DSU1S (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:27:18 -0400
Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:51203 "EHLO mail.zytor.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932385Ab2DSU1P (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:27:15 -0400
Message-ID: <4F907512.9060300@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:26:58 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>, ralf@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86, extable: Handle early exceptions
References: <1334794610-5546-1-git-send-email-hpa@zytor.com> <20120419092255.GA29542@aftab> <20120419092630.GD29542@aftab> <4F904541.2030200@zytor.com> <CA+55aFwMsm7zVqPjKptm38zJAbJpF=9e51ew7BP6S5YnoJa3ig@mail.gmail.com> <20120419173802.GI3221@aftab.osrc.amd.com> <4F90527B.7020005@zytor.com> <CA+55aFxhY1Ug5esj==Sm=o1Epg+NFnvFs74syqRxbYDbPQJEFA@mail.gmail.com> <9ff2e09c-57e4-455e-8614-1b3b17b652f4@email.android.com> <4F9072CA.6030903@gmail.com> <4F9073A6.4030709@zytor.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F9073A6.4030709@zytor.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 04/19/2012 01:20 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 04/19/2012 01:17 PM, David Daney wrote:
>> On 04/19/2012 11:55 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> Either way I suggest picking up David's presorting patchset since it
>>> is already done and use its infrastructure for any further improvements.
>>
>> It does have the advantage of already being implemented.  There was a
>> little feedback on the kbuild portions of the patch.
>>
>> If you would like, I will send an updated version of the patch.
> 
> Please.  It gets us 90% of the way, and we need the infrastructure
> anyway to do any further work.
> 

Linus, it's not really an x86 patchset, but would you object if I queue
up David's updated patchset in -tip?  I'll try to get an Ack from Ralf
for the MIPS portion.

	-hpa