From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 5/9] KVM: MMU: introduce SPTE_WRITE_PROTECT bit
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 16:19:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F911C05.2070701@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F911B74.4040305@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
If this bit is set, it means the W bit of the spte is cleared due
to shadow page table protection
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index dd984b6..eb02fc4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ module_param(dbg, bool, 0644);
#define SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE (1ULL << PT_FIRST_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT)
#define SPTE_ALLOW_WRITE (1ULL << (PT_FIRST_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT + 1))
+#define SPTE_WRITE_PROTECT (1ULL << (PT_FIRST_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT + 2))
#define SHADOW_PT_INDEX(addr, level) PT64_INDEX(addr, level)
@@ -1042,36 +1043,51 @@ static void drop_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
rmap_remove(kvm, sptep);
}
+static bool spte_wp_by_dirty_log(u64 spte)
+{
+ WARN_ON(is_writable_pte(spte));
+
+ return (spte & SPTE_ALLOW_WRITE) && !(spte & SPTE_WRITE_PROTECT);
+}
+
/* Return true if the spte is dropped. */
static bool spte_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep, bool large,
- bool *flush)
+ bool *flush, bool page_table_protect)
{
u64 spte = *sptep;
- if (!is_writable_pte(spte))
- return false;
+ if (is_writable_pte(spte)) {
+ *flush |= true;
- *flush |= true;
+ if (large) {
+ pgprintk("rmap_write_protect(large): spte %p %llx\n",
+ spte, *spte);
+ BUG_ON(!is_large_pte(spte));
- if (large) {
- pgprintk("rmap_write_protect(large): spte %p %llx\n",
- spte, *spte);
- BUG_ON(!is_large_pte(spte));
+ drop_spte(kvm, sptep);
+ --kvm->stat.lpages;
+ return true;
+ }
- drop_spte(kvm, sptep);
- --kvm->stat.lpages;
- return true;
+ goto reset_spte;
}
+ if (page_table_protect && spte_wp_by_dirty_log(spte))
+ goto reset_spte;
+
+ return false;
+
+reset_spte:
rmap_printk("rmap_write_protect: spte %p %llx\n", spte, *spte);
spte = spte & ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
+ if (page_table_protect)
+ spte |= SPTE_WRITE_PROTECT;
mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte);
-
return false;
}
-static bool
-__rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp, int level)
+static bool __rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp,
+ int level, bool page_table_protect)
{
u64 *sptep;
struct rmap_iterator iter;
@@ -1080,7 +1096,7 @@ __rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp, int level)
for (sptep = rmap_get_first(*rmapp, &iter); sptep;) {
BUG_ON(!(*sptep & PT_PRESENT_MASK));
if (spte_write_protect(kvm, sptep, level > PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL,
- &write_protected)) {
+ &write_protected, page_table_protect)) {
sptep = rmap_get_first(*rmapp, &iter);
continue;
}
@@ -1109,7 +1125,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_write_protect_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm,
while (mask) {
rmapp = &slot->rmap[gfn_offset + __ffs(mask)];
- __rmap_write_protect(kvm, rmapp, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL);
+ __rmap_write_protect(kvm, rmapp, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL, false);
/* clear the first set bit */
mask &= mask - 1;
@@ -1128,7 +1144,7 @@ static bool rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, u64 gfn)
for (i = PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL;
i < PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL + KVM_NR_PAGE_SIZES; ++i) {
rmapp = __gfn_to_rmap(gfn, i, slot);
- write_protected |= __rmap_write_protect(kvm, rmapp, i);
+ write_protected |= __rmap_write_protect(kvm, rmapp, i, true);
}
return write_protected;
@@ -1179,7 +1195,8 @@ static int kvm_set_pte_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp,
new_spte |= (u64)new_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
new_spte &= ~(PT_WRITABLE_MASK | SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE |
- shadow_accessed_mask | SPTE_ALLOW_WRITE);
+ shadow_accessed_mask | SPTE_ALLOW_WRITE |
+ SPTE_WRITE_PROTECT);
mmu_spte_clear_track_bits(sptep);
mmu_spte_set(sptep, new_spte);
@@ -2346,6 +2363,7 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
ret = 1;
pte_access &= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
spte &= ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
+ spte |= SPTE_WRITE_PROTECT;
}
}
@@ -3934,7 +3952,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access(struct kvm *kvm, int slot)
continue;
spte_write_protect(kvm, &pt[i],
- is_large_pte(pt[i]), &flush);
+ is_large_pte(pt[i]), &flush, false);
}
}
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
--
1.7.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-20 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-20 8:16 [PATCH v3 0/9] KVM: MMU: fast page fault Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 8:17 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] KVM: MMU: return bool in __rmap_write_protect Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 8:17 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] KVM: MMU: abstract spte write-protect Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 21:33 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-21 1:10 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-21 4:34 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-21 3:24 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-21 4:18 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-21 6:52 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 8:18 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] KVM: VMX: export PFEC.P bit on ept Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 8:18 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] KVM: MMU: introduce SPTE_ALLOW_WRITE bit Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 21:39 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-21 3:30 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-21 4:22 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-21 6:55 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-22 15:12 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-23 7:24 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 8:19 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2012-04-20 21:52 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] KVM: MMU: introduce SPTE_WRITE_PROTECT bit Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-21 0:40 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-21 0:55 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-21 1:38 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-21 4:29 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-21 4:00 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-24 0:45 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-24 3:34 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-21 3:47 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-21 4:38 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-21 7:25 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-24 0:24 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-20 8:19 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] KVM: MMU: fast path of handling guest page fault Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] KVM: MMU: trace fast " Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] KVM: MMU: fix kvm_mmu_pagetable_walk tracepoint Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 8:21 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] KVM: MMU: document mmu-lock and fast page fault Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-21 0:59 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] KVM: MMU: " Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F911C05.2070701@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox