public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Emil Goode <emilgoode@gmail.com>,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/tty: Use get_user instead of dereferencing user pointer
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 07:04:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F92BE52.4020908@symas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F927804.4090208@suse.cz>

Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 04/20/2012 11:00 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> It's not simple however, so can anyone work out or remember wtf the code
>> should be doing ???
>
> Huh.
>
> The code was added by:
> commit 26df6d13406d1a53b0bda08bd712f1924affd7cd
> Author: hyc@symas.com<hyc@symas.com>
> Date:   Tue Jun 22 10:14:49 2010 -0700
>
>      tty: Add EXTPROC support for LINEMODE
>
> ====
>
> The code is now:
>
> retval = copy_to_user(*b,&tty->read_buf[tty->read_tail], n);
> n -= retval;
> tty_audit_add_data(tty,&tty->read_buf[tty->read_tail], n);
> spin_lock_irqsave(&tty->read_lock, flags);
> tty->read_tail = (tty->read_tail + n)&  (N_TTY_BUF_SIZE-1);
> tty->read_cnt -= n;
> if (L_EXTPROC(tty)&&  tty->icanon&&  n == 1) {
>          if (!tty->read_cnt&&  (*b)[n-1] == EOF_CHAR(tty))
>                  n--;
> }
>
> ====
>
> n after "n -= retval" means number of successfully copied chars. So the
> test "n == 1" along with "!tty->read_cnt" actually should ensure we
> copied everything and that is exactly one char. Further we test if that
> one is EOF. If so, ignore that char by pretending we copied nothing.

Correct.

> However the implementation does not count with buffer wrapped like:
> EOF..........................something
>                               ^----- tail
>
> Here, the first call to copy_from_read_buf copies "something" and the
> second one is to copy single EOF. But that would be ignored! Is this
> expected?

Hmmm, probably not expected, no. The intent was to pass the EOF character 
through if it's part of a non-empty input line. But if the EOF is the first 
character on an input line, it should be treated as an EOF and no data 
returned from the read.

> So to fix the user buffer dereference, the following diff should help.
> In any case the wrapped buffer is still to be fixed... (Or ignored.)
> --- a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
> @@ -1630,6 +1630,7 @@ static int copy_from_read_buf(struct tty_struct *tty,
>          int retval;
>          size_t n;
>          unsigned long flags;
> +       bool is_eof;
>
>          retval = 0;
>          spin_lock_irqsave(&tty->read_lock, flags);
> @@ -1639,15 +1640,15 @@ static int copy_from_read_buf(struct tty_struct
> *tty,
>          if (n) {
>                  retval = copy_to_user(*b,
> &tty->read_buf[tty->read_tail], n);
>                  n -= retval;
> +               is_eof = n == 1&&
> +                       tty->read_buf[tty->read_tail] == EOF_CHAR(tty);
>                  tty_audit_add_data(tty,&tty->read_buf[tty->read_tail], n);
>                  spin_lock_irqsave(&tty->read_lock, flags);
>                  tty->read_tail = (tty->read_tail + n)&  (N_TTY_BUF_SIZE-1);
>                  tty->read_cnt -= n;
>                  /* Turn single EOF into zero-length read */
> -               if (L_EXTPROC(tty)&&  tty->icanon&&  n == 1) {
> -                       if (!tty->read_cnt&&  (*b)[n-1] == EOF_CHAR(tty))
> -                               n--;
> -               }
> +               if (L_EXTPROC(tty)&&  tty->icanon&&  is_eof&&
> !tty->read_cnt)
> +                       n = 0;
>                  spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty->read_lock, flags);
>                  *b += n;
>                  *nr -= n;
>
> thanks,


-- 
   -- Howard Chu
   CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
   Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
   Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-21 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-20 15:52 [PATCH] drivers/tty: Use get_user instead of dereferencing user pointer Emil Goode
2012-04-20 21:00 ` Alan Cox
2012-04-21  9:04   ` Jiri Slaby
2012-04-21 14:04     ` Howard Chu [this message]
2012-04-21 14:25       ` Howard Chu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F92BE52.4020908@symas.com \
    --to=hyc@symas.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=emilgoode@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox