From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752285Ab2DUVWS (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Apr 2012 17:22:18 -0400 Received: from smtp.fullrate.dk ([90.185.1.42]:64350 "EHLO smtp.fullrate.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751533Ab2DUVWS (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Apr 2012 17:22:18 -0400 Message-ID: <4F932506.8040606@molgaard.org> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 23:22:14 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sune_M=F8lgaard?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120421 Firefox/14.0a1 SeaMonkey/2.11a1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yinghai Lu CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Boot failure since 3.3-rc? References: <4F931C6D.8040407@molgaard.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Yinghai Lu wrote: > So kernel with reverting that commit will work well? Being new to reporting bisect results, I stupidly forgot to realise that this would be the final proof. Will report back when I know. > can you post boot with "debug ignore_loglevel initcall_debug" with and > without reverting that patch? Need to read up on netconsole as it's a headless machine. Would netconsole work through a switch, or would I need to find a cross-over cable? > Thanks > > Yinghai Thanks for replying. Will report back when I have something to share. Best regards, Sune -- Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't. - Margaret Thatcher