From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755013Ab2DWKda (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2012 06:33:30 -0400 Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:54620 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754273Ab2DWKd3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2012 06:33:29 -0400 Message-ID: <4F952FF4.8020303@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:33:24 +0200 From: Juri Lelli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Zijlstra CC: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, cfriesen@nortel.com, oleg@redhat.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, johan.eker@ericsson.com, p.faure@akatech.ch, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, claudio@evidence.eu.com, michael@amarulasolutions.com, fchecconi@gmail.com, tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it, nicola.manica@disi.unitn.it, luca.abeni@unitn.it, dhaval.giani@gmail.com, hgu1972@gmail.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, raistlin@linux.it, insop.song@ericsson.com, liming.wang@windriver.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/16] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE data structures. References: <1333696481-3433-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@gmail.com> <1333696481-3433-4-git-send-email-juri.lelli@gmail.com> <1335173641.28150.104.camel@twins> <4F952C11.2000109@gmail.com> <1335176929.28150.111.camel@twins> In-Reply-To: <1335176929.28150.111.camel@twins> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/23/2012 12:28 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 12:16 +0200, Juri Lelli wrote: >> On 04/23/2012 11:34 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 09:14 +0200, Juri Lelli wrote: >>>> + p->sched_class =&dl_sched_class; >>> >>> Does this patch actually compile? I've only seen a fwd declaration of >>> this variable but here you take an actual reference to it. >> >> The patch compiles (just tested), although this sounds strange to >> me too.. > > I just realized that its a proper definition without an initializer. So > no harm done, just a brain that still needs to wake up or so.. :-) Ouch.. right! A struct sched_class after all! Regarding brains, mine should be enough woken up at this time :-|. Thanks, - Juri