public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	<x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: x86: take precautions against spurious timer interrupts
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:55:55 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F96B0EB.1010601@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335183494-19645-1-git-send-email-vdavydov@parallels.com>

On 12-04-23 08:18 AM, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> If hpet is enabled by hpet_late_init() - this usually occurs on systems
> with buggy BIOS, which does not report about hpet presence through ACPI,
> hpet_clockevent's event_handler can be left uninitialized by
> clockevents_register_device() because of hpet_clockevent low rating (by
> the time hpet_late_init() is called, high prio apic timers have already
> been setup). The event_handler is then initialized a bit later by the
> clocksource_done_booting() procedure.
> 
> Normally, timer interrupts should not be delivered between these two
> calls, but if e.g. the kernel is booted using kexec, there might be some
> pending interrupts from the previous kernel's context, which can lead to
> a NULL pointer dereference.

Reading between the lines here, I'm guessing that this is specific
to the kexec use case, and never seen anywhere else?  In which case,
it seems a shame to add another conditional to the main timer_interrupt
for an event that may only happen once at boot, and even then, only
in a corner use-case.  Can you deal with the invalid state somewhere
in an _init section instead, perhaps even within CONFIG_KEXEC?  Or
at least ensure a dummy no-op handler is attached early enough?

Paul.
--

> 
> So, take precautions against spurious timer interrupts by checking the
> event_handler value before calling it.
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/time.c |   18 +++++++++++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/time.c b/arch/x86/kernel/time.c
> index c6eba2b..43bdd3a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/time.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/time.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,23 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(profile_pc);
>   */
>  static irqreturn_t timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  {
> -	global_clock_event->event_handler(global_clock_event);
> +	/*
> +	 * If hpet is enabled by hpet_late_init(), event_handler can be left
> +	 * uninitialized by clockevents_register_device() because of
> +	 * hpet_clockevent low rating (by the time hpet_late_init() is called,
> +	 * high prio apic timers have already been setup). The event_handler is
> +	 * then initialized a bit later by the clocksource_done_booting()
> +	 * procedure.
> +	 *
> +	 * Normally, timer interrupts should not be delivered between these two
> +	 * calls, but if e.g. the kernel is booted using kexec, there might be
> +	 * some pending interrupts from the previous kernel's context, which
> +	 * can lead to a NULL pointer dereference.
> +	 *
> +	 * So, take precautions against spurious timer interrupts.
> +	 */
> +	if (global_clock_event->event_handler)
> +		global_clock_event->event_handler(global_clock_event);
>  
>  	/* MCA bus quirk: Acknowledge irq0 by setting bit 7 in port 0x61 */
>  	if (MCA_bus)

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-24 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-23 12:18 [PATCH] arch: x86: take precautions against spurious timer interrupts Vladimir Davydov
2012-04-24 13:55 ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2012-04-24 14:08   ` Vladimir Davydov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F96B0EB.1010601@windriver.com \
    --to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@mit.edu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox