From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: x86: take precautions against spurious timer interrupts
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:08:29 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F96B3DD.3070909@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F96B0EB.1010601@windriver.com>
On 04/24/2012 05:55 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> On 12-04-23 08:18 AM, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
>> If hpet is enabled by hpet_late_init() - this usually occurs on systems
>> with buggy BIOS, which does not report about hpet presence through ACPI,
>> hpet_clockevent's event_handler can be left uninitialized by
>> clockevents_register_device() because of hpet_clockevent low rating (by
>> the time hpet_late_init() is called, high prio apic timers have already
>> been setup). The event_handler is then initialized a bit later by the
>> clocksource_done_booting() procedure.
>>
>> Normally, timer interrupts should not be delivered between these two
>> calls, but if e.g. the kernel is booted using kexec, there might be some
>> pending interrupts from the previous kernel's context, which can lead to
>> a NULL pointer dereference.
> Reading between the lines here, I'm guessing that this is specific
> to the kexec use case, and never seen anywhere else?
Yes, you're right. I've caught it several times while using kexec.
> In which case,
> it seems a shame to add another conditional to the main timer_interrupt
> for an event that may only happen once at boot, and even then, only
> in a corner use-case. Can you deal with the invalid state somewhere
> in an _init section instead, perhaps even within CONFIG_KEXEC? Or
> at least ensure a dummy no-op handler is attached early enough?
>
> Paul.
> --
Agree.
I can init hpet_clockevent.event_handler with clockevents_handle_noop()
in its definition.
Will rework and resend.
Thanks for replying.
>
>> So, take precautions against spurious timer interrupts by checking the
>> event_handler value before calling it.
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/time.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/time.c b/arch/x86/kernel/time.c
>> index c6eba2b..43bdd3a 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/time.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/time.c
>> @@ -57,7 +57,23 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(profile_pc);
>> */
>> static irqreturn_t timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> {
>> - global_clock_event->event_handler(global_clock_event);
>> + /*
>> + * If hpet is enabled by hpet_late_init(), event_handler can be left
>> + * uninitialized by clockevents_register_device() because of
>> + * hpet_clockevent low rating (by the time hpet_late_init() is called,
>> + * high prio apic timers have already been setup). The event_handler is
>> + * then initialized a bit later by the clocksource_done_booting()
>> + * procedure.
>> + *
>> + * Normally, timer interrupts should not be delivered between these two
>> + * calls, but if e.g. the kernel is booted using kexec, there might be
>> + * some pending interrupts from the previous kernel's context, which
>> + * can lead to a NULL pointer dereference.
>> + *
>> + * So, take precautions against spurious timer interrupts.
>> + */
>> + if (global_clock_event->event_handler)
>> + global_clock_event->event_handler(global_clock_event);
>>
>> /* MCA bus quirk: Acknowledge irq0 by setting bit 7 in port 0x61 */
>> if (MCA_bus)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-24 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-23 12:18 [PATCH] arch: x86: take precautions against spurious timer interrupts Vladimir Davydov
2012-04-24 13:55 ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-04-24 14:08 ` Vladimir Davydov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F96B3DD.3070909@parallels.com \
--to=vdavydov@parallels.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@mit.edu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox