public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
	Xen Devel <Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	Rob Lee <rob.lee@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: clean up time
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:01:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F9722CA.80403@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120423164859.082b5c53b5d9bd9a524ec864@canb.auug.org.au>

On 04/22/2012 11:48 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2012 11:20:09 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
<sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>
>> Can people please clean up stuff in their trees that has been merged by
>> their upstream. This is especially useful where the upstream merged (or
>> applied) a slightly different version of their tree.
>
> There is still much cruft in the linux-next included trees ... The
> following trees appear empty (relative to Linus' tree) but cause conflicts:
>
> bjdooks-i2c
> xen
> dma-buf
> cpuidle-cons

Are you pulling from xen.git upstream/xen?  I just updated it to be
current Linus master, so it shouldn't conflict any more.

Thanks,
    J


  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-24 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-02  1:20 linux-next: clean up time Stephen Rothwell
2012-04-23  6:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-04-24 22:01   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2012-04-25  0:00     ` Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-05-13  1:44 Stephen Rothwell
2019-01-07  3:38 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F9722CA.80403@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    --cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rob.lee@linaro.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox