From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932282Ab2DYAbT (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:31:19 -0400 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:60757 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752744Ab2DYAbS (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:31:18 -0400 X-SecurityPolicyCheck: OK by SHieldMailChecker v1.7.4 Message-ID: <4F97456B.5090201@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:29:31 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frederic Weisbecker CC: Tejun Heo , Li Zefan , LKML , Glauber Costa , "Kirill A. Shutemov" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] res_counter: Account max_usage when calling res_counter_charge_nofail() References: <1335309096-12886-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1335309096-12886-3-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1335309096-12886-3-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (2012/04/25 8:11), Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > Updating max_usage is something one would expect when we reach > a new maximum usage value even when we do this by forcing through > the limit with res_counter_charge_nofail(). > > (Whether we want to account failcnt when we force through the limit > is another debate). > > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker > Cc: Tejun Heo > Cc: Li Zefan > Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki > Cc: Glauber Costa > Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki