From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753607Ab2DYOmf (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:42:35 -0400 Received: from mx2.parallels.com ([64.131.90.16]:55898 "EHLO mx2.parallels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752230Ab2DYOmd (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:42:33 -0400 Message-ID: <4F980CF2.9020905@parallels.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:40:50 -0300 From: Glauber Costa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki CC: Frederic Weisbecker , Tejun Heo , Li Zefan , LKML , "Kirill A. Shutemov" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] res_counter: Account max_usage when calling res_counter_charge_nofail() References: <1335309096-12886-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1335309096-12886-3-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <4F97456B.5090201@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <4F97456B.5090201@jp.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [201.82.19.44] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/24/2012 09:29 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > (2012/04/25 8:11), Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > >> Updating max_usage is something one would expect when we reach >> a new maximum usage value even when we do this by forcing through >> the limit with res_counter_charge_nofail(). >> >> (Whether we want to account failcnt when we force through the limit >> is another debate). >> >> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker >> Cc: Tejun Heo >> Cc: Li Zefan >> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki >> Cc: Glauber Costa >> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov > > > Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki > Acked-by: Glauber Costa