From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759223Ab2DYVAt (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:00:49 -0400 Received: from smtp4.mundo-r.com ([212.51.32.151]:56348 "EHLO smtp4.mundo-r.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758746Ab2DYVAr (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:00:47 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiQGAH9lmE9bdWOb/2dsb2JhbABFgx2rEYMggQeCCQEBBXgBEAsYCRYPCQMCAQIBRQYNAQcCiA+7T5BgBJV7kD6Caw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,483,1330902000"; d="scan'208";a="981469186" Message-ID: <4F986726.1020601@igalia.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:05:42 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Javier_Mu=F1oz?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20120104 Icedove/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: gewang@siliconmotion.com, boyod.yang@siliconmotion.com.cn, wuzhangjin@gmail.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: sm7xx: code improvements and cleanup References: <1335387028-29652-1-git-send-email-jmunhoz@igalia.com> <20120425205532.GA9642@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20120425205532.GA9642@kroah.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/25/2012 10:55 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:50:28PM +0200, Javier M. Mellid wrote: >> This patch implements some code improvements and cleanup. >> >> New code uses dynamic debug support. Old debug calls updated/tested to >> use this API. >> >> Cleanup on obsolete references, internal versions and some >> comments. Dead code removal. >> >> Patch tested with SM712. >> >> Changes: >> >> - Code improvements and cleanup >> - Use dynamic debug support >> - Remove out-of-date comments/references >> - Remove dead code > > Can you please break this down into individual patches, each doing only > one thing, so that we can review it easier? Otherwise, it's quite > difficult, which is one reason why we require patches to be created this > way. Yes, of course. Thanks! Javier