From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759411Ab2D0CR3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2012 22:17:29 -0400 Received: from avon.wwwdotorg.org ([70.85.31.133]:55999 "EHLO avon.wwwdotorg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757954Ab2D0CR2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2012 22:17:28 -0400 Message-ID: <4F9A01B6.2050502@wwwdotorg.org> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:17:26 -0600 From: Stephen Warren User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Walleij CC: Dong Aisheng , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, s.hauer@pengutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: support gpio request deferred probing References: <1335353894-22096-1-git-send-email-b29396@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/26/2012 03:36 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Dong Aisheng wrote: > >> From: Dong Aisheng >> >> As pinctrl handles, it may be possible the pinctrl gpio ranges >> are still not got registered when user call pinctrl_gpio_request. >> Thus, add defer support for it too. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng > > Since nobody is saying anything and it looks reasonable, > I just applied this. I didn't look at this, because V4 was sent without this patch, so I assumed it'd been dropped by Dong. Was I wrong?