public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, autofs@vger.kernel.org,
	raven@themaw.net, stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Introduce a version6 of autofs interface, to fix design error.
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 23:53:48 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F9D9C4C.7000904@msgid.tls.msk.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwTUDsefBd9c-wp8jrnp4tOh6jyJkjc_UZut-J6FHSF+w@mail.gmail.com>

On 29.04.2012 23:09, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> This keeps Alan's idea of using O_DIRECT, but only makes it matter for
> the writer - because now the "packet" thing is a per-pipe-buffer state
> (we already had per-pipe-buffer flags, so this is not anything new).
> So when you *write* using a O_DIRECT pipe, it will create packetized
> buffers, and the reader just sees that directly.
> 
> So this should "just work", and doesn't need any extra flags in the
> pipe_inode_info. And the user space interface remains the same: you
> can create these packet pipes with "pipe2(fd, O_DIRECT)" if you want
> to, and my test-program gives exactly the same output.

Ok.  I verified this on 3.3 kernel (with the original fix reverted),
and now both autofs5 and systemd works.

I also verified it on 3.0 kernel (3.0.30), the patch also applies
there just fine (with 1..2 lines offsets) and works too -- at least
on 32/64 bits.

So, the result appears to be an excellent solution to a bad problem...

Thank you all for the efforts and support!

You can add my

Tested-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>

(I'd add a Signed-off-by, but it is not my patch ;)

/mjt

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-29 19:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-26 13:34 [PATCH v2] Introduce a version6 of autofs interface, to fix design error Michael Tokarev
2012-04-26 13:44 ` Michael Tokarev
2012-04-27  0:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-27  9:45   ` Michael Tokarev
2012-04-27 15:47     ` Mark Lord
2012-04-27 20:37       ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-28 22:20         ` Mark Lord
2012-04-27 16:22     ` David Miller
2012-04-27 17:10       ` Michael Tokarev
2012-04-27 17:28         ` David Miller
2012-04-27 18:19     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-27 18:34       ` David Miller
2012-04-27 18:42         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-27 18:55           ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-27 19:14             ` David Miller
2012-04-27 19:16               ` David Miller
2012-04-27 19:19                 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-27 19:24                   ` David Miller
2012-04-27 19:56                     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-27 20:13                       ` Stef Bon
2012-04-27 20:29                       ` David Miller
2012-04-27 22:40                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-27 20:43                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-27 22:42                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-27 22:56                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-27 23:07                             ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-28  0:03                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-28  0:17                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-27 22:42                       ` Alan Cox
2012-04-27 22:49                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-27 23:27                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-28 16:10                           ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-29  6:37                             ` Michael Tokarev
2012-04-29  7:19                               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-29  7:45                                 ` Michael Tokarev
2012-04-29 18:29                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-29 19:09                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-29 19:53                                       ` Michael Tokarev [this message]
2012-04-29 20:53                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-30  8:41                                         ` Thomas Meyer
2012-04-28  1:56               ` Ian Kent
2012-04-27 19:08           ` David Miller
2012-04-27 20:45             ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-27 20:42       ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F9D9C4C.7000904@msgid.tls.msk.ru \
    --to=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=autofs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=raven@themaw.net \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas@m3y3r.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox