From: "Oleksij Rempel (fishor)" <bug-track@fisher-privat.net>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Mailing List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@wrar.name>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / PCI: Make _SxD/_SxW check follow ACPI 4.0a spec
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 18:27:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FA00EE5.2060403@fisher-privat.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1205011004030.1499-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On 01.05.2012 16:11, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 1 May 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
>>> I mean not just the mapping.
>>> I mean PCI:PME_SUP field. If it PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+), and
>>> acpi trying to avoid D3 states for this device. then is is same like
>>> PME(D0+,D1-,D2-)? Or not?
>>
>> Yes, if _S3D or _S3W are present. If they are not present and _PRW is,
>> that means "don't care".
>>
>>> According to spec.:
>>> 7.2 Device Power Management Objects (page 287)
>>> _S3D - Highest D-state supported by the device in the S3 state
>>> _S3W - Lowest D-state supported by the device in the S3 state which can
>>> wake the system.
>>> by definition if _S3W is specified then we can assume, the device can
>>> wake? But _SxW is not defined.
>>
>> The device can wake up the system if _PRW is present for it (and for
>> PCIe devices even that is not formally necessary).
>>
>>> Are there any other method to forbid the system use broken state, after
>>> device was actually produced? Usual BIOS flash utility will probably no
>>> rewrite the PCIs EEPROM. Only hope is ACPI, what is correct method to do
>>> define it by ACPI?
>>
>> Define _S3D that will return 2 (for example) and _PRW returning 3 as the
>> deepest sleep state the system may be woken up from. Then, we'll use
>> D2 (after the @subject patch).
>>
>> The drawback is that the kernel will then think the device can wake up
>> the system.
>
> There also remains a question about runtime power states and resume.
>
> Oleksij, with your patch, which state does the controller get put into
> during runtime suspend, D2 or D3? (You may need to enable runtime
> suspend by doing
>
> echo auto>/sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:00:1d.0/power/control
>
> in order to test this.) And if the controller is in runtime suspend,
> does it resume correctly when you plug in a new USB device?
>
> I'm pretty sure that without the patch, the controller gets put into D3
> and resume does work.
I do not know if device really suspended, but every thing works like
before. New usb devices are recognized and working.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-01 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-29 20:44 [PATCH] ACPI / PCI: Make _SxD/_SxW check follow ACPI 4.0a spec Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-30 16:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-04-30 17:53 ` Alan Stern
2012-04-30 21:30 ` Oleksij Rempel
2012-04-30 21:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-01 6:38 ` Oleksij Rempel (fishor)
2012-05-01 14:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-01 14:11 ` Alan Stern
2012-05-01 16:27 ` Oleksij Rempel (fishor) [this message]
2012-05-01 16:59 ` Alan Stern
2012-05-02 4:10 ` Oleksij Rempel (fishor)
2012-04-30 21:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-30 21:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-30 21:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-05-10 20:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-11 0:08 ` Greg KH
2012-07-11 9:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-11 13:53 ` Greg KH
2012-07-11 19:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-11 19:20 ` Greg KH
2012-07-11 19:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-12 4:30 ` Ben Hutchings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FA00EE5.2060403@fisher-privat.net \
--to=bug-track@fisher-privat.net \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=wrar@wrar.name \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox