public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	sfr@canb.auug.org.au
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/4] ipc/mqueue: improve performance of send/recv
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 09:03:44 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FA28230.5080507@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120503092105.GA6603@mwanda>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2576 bytes --]

On 5/3/2012 5:21 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 01:50:52PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
>> @@ -150,16 +241,25 @@ static struct inode *mqueue_get_inode(struct super_block *sb,
>>  			info->attr.mq_maxmsg = attr->mq_maxmsg;
>>  			info->attr.mq_msgsize = attr->mq_msgsize;
>>  		}
>> -		mq_msg_tblsz = info->attr.mq_maxmsg * sizeof(struct msg_msg *);
>> -		if (mq_msg_tblsz > PAGE_SIZE)
>> -			info->messages = vmalloc(mq_msg_tblsz);
>> -		else
>> -			info->messages = kmalloc(mq_msg_tblsz, GFP_KERNEL);
>> -		if (!info->messages)
>> -			goto out_inode;
>> +		/*
>> +		 * We used to allocate a static array of pointers and account
>> +		 * the size of that array as well as one msg_msg struct per
>> +		 * possible message into the queue size. That's no longer
>> +		 * accurate as the queue is now an rbtree and will grow and
>> +		 * shrink depending on usage patterns.  We can, however, still
>> +		 * account one msg_msg struct per message, but the nodes are
>> +		 * allocated depending on priority usage, and most programs
>> +		 * only use one, or a handful, of priorities.  However, since
>> +		 * this is pinned memory, we need to assume worst case, so
>> +		 * that means the min(mq_maxmsg, max_priorities) * struct
>> +		 * posix_msg_tree_node.
>> +		 */
>> +		mq_treesize = info->attr.mq_maxmsg * sizeof(struct msg_msg) +
>> +			min_t(unsigned int, info->attr.mq_maxmsg, MQ_PRIO_MAX) *
>> +			sizeof(struct posix_msg_tree_node);
> 
> "info->attr.mq_maxmsg" is a long, but the min_t() truncates it to an
> unsigned int.  I'm not familiar with this code so I don't know if
> that's a problem...

It's fine.  We currently cap mq_maxmsg at a hard limit of 65536, and
MQ_PRIO_MAX is 32768, so both well within the limits of truncating a
long to unsigned int.  In order for this to ever be a problem, we would
first have to change the accounting of mq bytes in the user struct from
a 32bit type to a 64bit type.  As long as it's still 32 bits, and as
long as mq_maxmsg * (sizeof(struct msg_msg) + mq_msgsize) must fit
within that 32bit struct, we will never have an mq_maxmsg large enough
to truncate in this situation.

> We do the same thing in mqueue_evict_inode() and mq_attr_ok().

All of the math in here would need an audit if we increased the maximum
mq bytes from 32bit to 64bit.


-- 
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
              GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD
	      http://people.redhat.com/dledford

Infiniband specific RPMs available at
	      http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 898 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-03 13:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-01 17:50 [Patch 0/4] ipc/mqueue improvements Doug Ledford
2012-05-01 17:50 ` [Patch 1/4] ipc/mqueue: improve performance of send/recv Doug Ledford
2012-05-01 17:50   ` [Patch 2/4] ipc/mqueue: correct mq_attr_ok test Doug Ledford
2012-05-01 19:34     ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-01 19:38       ` Doug Ledford
2012-05-01 17:50   ` [Patch 3/4] ipc/mqueue: strengthen checks on mqueue creation Doug Ledford
2012-05-01 20:01     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-05-01 20:11       ` Doug Ledford
2012-05-01 20:18         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-05-01 23:02           ` Doug Ledford
2012-05-01 23:04             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-05-01 23:11               ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-01 17:50   ` [Patch 4/4] tools/selftests: add mq_perf_tests Doug Ledford
2012-05-01 19:53     ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-01 20:14       ` Doug Ledford
2012-05-03  9:21   ` [Patch 1/4] ipc/mqueue: improve performance of send/recv Dan Carpenter
2012-05-03 13:03     ` Doug Ledford [this message]
2012-05-03 10:05   ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FA28230.5080507@redhat.com \
    --to=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox