From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>, Jana Saout <jana@saout.de>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Oops with DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS and ocfs2, autofs4
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 11:27:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FA2CDFC.6070901@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFxrBghonjRvS=KK=5Oqw_Wj9PDh2wkDtVh7U9jw8=uTsA@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/03/2012 11:23 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> I left the instruction suffixes in place, although Peter is probably
> right that the assembler will do the right thing.
>
Yes, and we have <asm/asm.h> for the case where it doesn't (where there
is only a memory operand, for example.) I tend to put the suffixes in
even if they are redundant, but we already rely on the unsuffixed
instructions working in many, many places.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-03 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-30 12:27 Oops with DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS and ocfs2, autofs4 Jana Saout
2012-05-01 11:00 ` Joel Becker
2012-05-01 12:28 ` Jana Saout
2012-05-03 5:02 ` Nick Piggin
2012-05-03 5:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-03 5:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-03 6:23 ` Nick Piggin
2012-05-03 6:26 ` Nick Piggin
2012-05-03 6:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-03 6:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-03 6:54 ` David Miller
2012-05-03 6:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-03 7:02 ` David Miller
2012-05-03 6:47 ` Al Viro
2012-05-03 16:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-03 17:30 ` Al Viro
2012-05-03 17:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-03 18:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-03 18:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-03 18:27 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2012-05-03 18:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-03 18:48 ` David Miller
2012-05-03 21:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-03 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-03 20:30 ` Jana Saout
2012-05-03 21:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-03 21:03 ` Jana Saout
2012-05-03 21:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-03 21:47 ` Jana Saout
2012-05-04 11:21 ` Jana Saout
2012-05-03 8:01 ` Jana Saout
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FA2CDFC.6070901@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jana@saout.de \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox