From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759409Ab2EIQWv (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2012 12:22:51 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:37956 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757998Ab2EIQWt (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2012 12:22:49 -0400 Message-ID: <4FAA99D5.9090404@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 10:22:45 -0600 From: David Ahern User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf record: fix fallback to cpu-clock on ppc References: <1336452004-55724-1-git-send-email-dsahern@gmail.com> <20120509145619.GM2485@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20120509145619.GM2485@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/9/12 8:56 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:40:04PM -0600, David Ahern escreveu: >> perf-record on PPC is not falling back to cpu-clock: >> >> Old kernel, cannot exclude guest or host samples. >> >> Error: sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 6 (No such device or address). /bin/dmesg may provide additional information. >> >> Fatal: No CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS=y kernel support configured? >> >> The problem is that until 2.6.37 (behavior changed with commit b0a873e) >> perf on PPC returns ENXIO when hw_perf_event_init() fails. With this >> patch we get the expected behavior: >> >> Old kernel, cannot exclude guest or host samples. >> The cycles event is not supported, trying to fall back to cpu-clock-ticks >> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] >> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.150 MB /tmp/perf.data (~6569 samples) ] > > Thanks, applied to my perf/core branch. > > Can you please provide one for perf/urgent? Not needed. Problem on perf/core was introduced by 5a7ed29c7572d00a75e8c4529e30c5ac2ef82271 The perf-stat version is needed and applies cleanly (though with an offset) to perf/urgent. David