From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1758488Ab2EJOza (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 10 May 2012 10:55:30 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:2839 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751938Ab2EJOz3 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 10 May 2012 10:55:29 -0400
Message-ID: <4FABD6BE.1060401@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 10:54:54 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rajman mekaco <rajman.mekaco@gmail.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>, Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mlock: split the shmlock_user_lock spinlock into
 per user_struct spinlock
References: <1336066477-3964-1-git-send-email-rajman.mekaco@gmail.com> <4FA2C946.60006@redhat.com> <4FA2EA4A.6040703@redhat.com> <CAMYGaxosaVXmpQQqpq+bGV9F7-i8APTpDq=ErWdhw2EHGEzmKg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMYGaxruZbhvtZg76_zo6-BjChObpCAE8-MTA=xbBOavct+XNw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMYGaxruZbhvtZg76_zo6-BjChObpCAE8-MTA=xbBOavct+XNw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 05/10/2012 09:34 AM, rajman mekaco wrote:

> Any updates on this ?

There is still no usecase to demonstrate a problem, so no real
justification to merge the patch.  Coming up with such a usecase
is up to the submitter of the patch.

-- 
All rights reversed