public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: John David Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
	stepanm@codeaurora.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, deller@gmx.de,
	dhowells@redhat.com, yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com,
	eike-kernel@sf-tec.de, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.4-rc7
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 01:58:47 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB0197F.6010000@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BLU0-SMTP22F4864AE1F54838C150D797150@phx.gbl>

On 05/14/2012 01:38 AM, John David Anglin wrote:

> On 13-May-12, at 3:56 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> 
>> The regression was introduced in the 3.4 merge window itself (by commit
>> 5fbd036b55 "sched: Cleanup cpu_active madness").
>>
>> Links to the original posting:
>> PA_RISC: http://marc.info/?l=linux-parisc&m=133241790810604&w=2
> 
> 
> If I had the above change, I get
> 
>   CHK     include/generated/compile.h
>   CC      arch/parisc/kernel/smp.o
> arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c: In function 'smp_cpu_init':
> arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c:300:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'notify_cpu_starting' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[1]: *** [arch/parisc/kernel/smp.o] Error 1
> 


Sorry about that. I neither have the hardware nor the toolchain
to test it. I guess this problem doesn't exist for mn10300 since it
already includes linux/cpu.h when CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=y

Does the below updated patch help for PA-RISC?

----
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

parisc/CPU hotplug: Add missing call to notify_cpu_starting()

The scheduler depends on receiving the CPU_STARTING notification, without
which we end up into a lot of trouble. So add the missing call to
notify_cpu_starting() in the bringup code.

Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

 arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c |    8 +++++++-
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)


diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
index 0bb1d63..4dc7b79 100644
--- a/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/bitops.h>
 #include <linux/ftrace.h>
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
 
 #include <linux/atomic.h>
 #include <asm/current.h>
@@ -295,8 +296,13 @@ smp_cpu_init(int cpunum)
 
 		printk(KERN_CRIT "CPU#%d already initialized!\n", cpunum);
 		machine_halt();
-	}  
+	}
+
+	notify_cpu_starting(cpunum);
+
+	ipi_call_lock();
 	set_cpu_online(cpunum, true);
+	ipi_call_unlock();
 
 	/* Initialise the idle task for this CPU */
 	atomic_inc(&init_mm.mm_count);


  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-13 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-13  2:04 Linux 3.4-rc7 Linus Torvalds
2012-05-13 19:56 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-05-13 20:08   ` John David Anglin
2012-05-13 20:28     ` Srivatsa S. Bhat [this message]
2012-05-13 20:40       ` John David Anglin
2012-05-14  0:42         ` John David Anglin
2012-05-15 17:24           ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-15 18:29             ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-05-15 18:39               ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-05-15 18:42               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-15 18:45                 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-05-15 19:04                   ` James Bottomley
2012-08-02  1:00           ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-08-02  1:47             ` John David Anglin
2012-08-07 18:41               ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-08-07 19:00                 ` John David Anglin
2012-05-13 20:30   ` Tobias Ulmer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FB0197F.6010000@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave.anglin@bell.net \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=eike-kernel@sf-tec.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=stepanm@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox