From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933428Ab2EPNkN (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2012 09:40:13 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:9963 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932296Ab2EPNkI (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2012 09:40:08 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="100755388" Message-ID: <4FB3AE32.8060006@intel.com> Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 21:40:02 +0800 From: Alex Shi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Rothwell CC: Tejun Heo , Rusty Russell , Christoph Lameter , Ingo Molnar , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suresh Siddha , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the tip tree References: <20120516173616.ed5b60cf4b16e34a57206559@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20120516173616.ed5b60cf4b16e34a57206559@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/16/2012 03:36 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the percpu tree got a conflict in > arch/x86/mm/tlb.c between commit a6fca40f1d7f ("x86, tlb: Switch cr3 in > leave_mm() only when needed") from the tip tree and commit c6ae41e7d469 > ("x86: replace percpu_xxx funcs with this_cpu_xxx") from the percpu tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. Thanks a lot! My auto-scripts just watching upstream kernel, so missing this... but happy to know the pain of code clean up is closing soon. ;)