From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965704Ab2EQATL (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2012 20:19:11 -0400 Received: from usmamail.tilera.com ([12.216.194.151]:23696 "EHLO USMAMAIL.TILERA.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965369Ab2EQATJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2012 20:19:09 -0400 Message-ID: <4FB443FA.1070003@tilera.com> Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 20:19:06 -0400 From: Chris Metcalf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Rothwell CC: , LKML Subject: Re: linux-next: bad commit in the tile tree References: <20120517091417.62c65eea7002be18d8af2f34@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20120517091417.62c65eea7002be18d8af2f34@canb.auug.org.au> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/16/2012 7:14 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Chris, > > The top commit on the tile tree has a bad description ("usb hackery" does > not tell us anything), sprinkles stuff (mainly printk()s) all over the > generic usb code and is not signed off by anyone ... > > I assume it is a debugging patch (or similar) and should *not* be in > linux-next. > > I will use the version of the tile tree from next-20120516 for today > (unless you update your tree very soon). Oops :-) It is debugging hackery. I committed it to do work on a different branch, which I then pushed, forgetting that by default I'd push the linux-next branch as well. Fixed now. Sorry! -- Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp. http://www.tilera.com