From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: "lrg@ti.com" <lrg@ti.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: use correct device for device supply lookup
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 22:50:54 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB7D676.9000609@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FB7D4D8.2050501@nvidia.com>
On Saturday 19 May 2012 10:44 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> On Saturday 19 May 2012 10:11 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>>
>> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 07:44:06PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>> When registering the regulator driver, use the rdev->dev for
>>> getting the regulator device of given supply instead of parent
>>> device.
>> You're providing no motivation for this and it's difficult to see how it
>> improves things. The class device is dynamically numbered so it's not
>> suitable for specifying supplies on a non-DT system and for a DT system
>> it's not obvious to me that we would want to involve the class device in
>> anything, it requires an additional layer of indirection but that's
>> about it.
> If I dont do this then it will not enter in the following case for
> getting the regulator_dev of supply regulator because dev->of_node is
> null, the tps65910-regulator driver have not set the pdev->dev.ofnode.
>
> static struct regulator_dev *regulator_dev_lookup(struct device *dev,
> const char *supply,
> int *ret)
> {
> /* first do a dt based lookup */
> if (dev&& dev->of_node) {
> ::::::::::::::::
> /* Get the regulator device */
>
> }
> ::::::::::::::::::
> }
Also in regulator_register we set the of_node as
rdev->dev.of_node = config->of_node;
rdev->dev.parent = dev;
Passed config->of_node will only be used if we pass the rdev->dev, not
rdev->dev.parent
Am I missing anything here in understanding?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-19 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-19 14:14 [PATCH] regulator: core: use correct device for device supply lookup Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-19 16:41 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-19 17:14 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-19 17:20 ` Laxman Dewangan [this message]
2012-05-19 17:40 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-19 17:56 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-19 18:26 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-19 19:03 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-19 20:50 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-19 21:13 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-19 23:13 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-20 7:34 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-20 9:01 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <4FB8C9EF.7010400@nvidia.com>
2012-05-20 12:06 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-20 12:14 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-20 12:10 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-19 17:28 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FB7D676.9000609@nvidia.com \
--to=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrg@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox