From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754773Ab2EUGpA (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2012 02:45:00 -0400 Received: from na3sys009aog111.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.205]:48791 "EHLO na3sys009aog111.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752441Ab2EUGo6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2012 02:44:58 -0400 Message-ID: <4FB9E461.9060405@ti.com> Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 12:14:49 +0530 From: Santosh Shilimkar User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Colin Cross CC: Len Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Kevin Hilman , Arjan van de Ven , Deepthi Dharwar , Daniel Lezcano , Amit Kucheria , Lorenzo Pieralisi , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] bug fixes for coupled cpuidle References: <1337364324-12171-1-git-send-email-ccross@android.com> In-Reply-To: <1337364324-12171-1-git-send-email-ccross@android.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 18 May 2012 11:35 PM, Colin Cross wrote: > The last modifications made to the coupled cpuidle patches introduced > two bugs that I missed during testing. The online count was never > initialized, causing coupled idle to always wait and never enter the > ready loop. That hid the second bug, the ready count could never be > decremented after exiting idle. > > Len, these two patches could be squashed into patch 3 of the original > set. If you do squash them, you could also add Rafael's tags to the > set (Reviewed-by on 1 and 2, acked-by on 3). Or I can reupload the > whole stack as v5 if you prefer. I confirm that these two fixes are needed to get couple idle v4 series working. Regards Santosh