From: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eranian@google.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf, x86: Optimal way of reading LBR entries inside Intel PMU interrupt handler
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 16:40:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FBB7419.8090909@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
perf, x86: Optimal way of reading LBR entries inside Intel PMU interrupt handler
We read LBR entries even if no event has requested for it either explicitly
through branch sampling or implicitly through precise IP. This patch would
fix this potential unnecessary read by moving the intel_pmu_lbr_read function.
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 26b3e2f..c50da47 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -1026,6 +1026,7 @@ static int intel_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
int bit, loops;
u64 status;
int handled;
+ int lbr_read;
perf_sample_data_init(&data, 0);
@@ -1061,16 +1062,16 @@ again:
inc_irq_stat(apic_perf_irqs);
- intel_pmu_lbr_read();
-
/*
* PEBS overflow sets bit 62 in the global status register
*/
if (__test_and_clear_bit(62, (unsigned long *)&status)) {
handled++;
+ intel_pmu_lbr_read();
x86_pmu.drain_pebs(regs);
}
+ lbr_read = 0;
for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&status, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX) {
struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[bit];
@@ -1084,8 +1085,13 @@ again:
data.period = event->hw.last_period;
- if (has_branch_stack(event))
+ if (has_branch_stack(event)) {
+ if(lbr_read == 0) {
+ intel_pmu_lbr_read();
+ lbr_read = 1;
+ }
data.br_stack = &cpuc->lbr_stack;
+ }
if (perf_event_overflow(event, &data, regs))
x86_pmu_stop(event, 0);
next reply other threads:[~2012-05-22 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-22 11:10 Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2012-05-22 11:49 ` [PATCH] perf, x86: Optimal way of reading LBR entries inside Intel PMU interrupt handler Stephane Eranian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FBB7419.8090909@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox