From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Indan Zupancic <indan@nul.nu>,
Roland McGrath <mcgrathr@google.com>,
Eric Paris <netdev@parisplace.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, mingo@redhat.com,
oleg@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, rdunlap@xenotime.net,
tglx@linutronix.de, luto@mit.edu, eparis@redhat.com,
serge.hallyn@canonical.com, pmoore@redhat.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, corbet@lwn.net,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, markus@chromium.org,
coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, keescook@chromium.org
Subject: Re: seccomp and ptrace. what is the correct order?
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 14:09:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FBC0078.7010002@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABqD9haSh=Tof9n2m8PHBaoqac1kcUZq-f5BcjDBv++5APGTCg@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/22/2012 01:48 PM, Will Drewry wrote:
>
> That was my first thought too, so I ran a few simple tests. gcc isn't
> smart enough to not add ~344 bytes of code to get the number and
> arguments for the x86/kernel/ptrace.c case I included (in the
> naive-est of integrations). But I don't know that it justifies the
> extra patchwork or enforcing shared code across arches.
>
I suspect the construction of those inlines can be improved.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-22 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-21 18:21 seccomp and ptrace. what is the correct order? Eric Paris
2012-05-21 18:25 ` Roland McGrath
2012-05-21 19:20 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-05-22 16:23 ` Will Drewry
2012-05-22 16:26 ` Will Drewry
2012-05-22 17:39 ` Al Viro
2012-05-22 20:26 ` Will Drewry
2012-05-22 20:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-22 20:48 ` Will Drewry
2012-05-22 21:07 ` Al Viro
2012-05-22 21:17 ` Roland McGrath
2012-05-22 21:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-22 22:20 ` Al Viro
2012-05-22 21:09 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2012-05-22 21:14 ` Will Drewry
2012-05-22 21:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-24 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] move the secure_computing call Will Drewry
2012-05-24 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] seccomp: Don't allow tracers to abuse RET_TRACE Will Drewry
2012-05-24 17:54 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-05-24 18:24 ` Will Drewry
2012-05-24 20:17 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-05-24 16:08 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] arch/x86: move secure_computing after ptrace Will Drewry
2012-05-24 16:08 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] arch/*: move secure_computing after trace Will Drewry
2012-05-24 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] move the secure_computing call H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-24 18:07 ` Roland McGrath
2012-05-24 18:27 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-05-24 18:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-24 19:39 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-05-24 22:00 ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-25 1:55 ` Will Drewry
2012-05-24 23:40 ` James Morris
2012-05-24 23:43 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-05-24 23:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-25 0:26 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-05-25 0:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-25 0:55 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-05-21 18:47 ` seccomp and ptrace. what is the correct order? richard -rw- weinberger
2012-05-21 19:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FBC0078.7010002@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=indan@nul.nu \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@mit.edu \
--cc=markus@chromium.org \
--cc=mcgrathr@google.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@parisplace.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmoore@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox