public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: eranian@google.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: perf record: why we used type casting of (uint64_t *) instead of int
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 14:51:42 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FBDFDA6.5010304@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)

Hey Stephane,

Just wondering why we used the type casting of (uint64_t *) on a data 
which is defined as "int" in the structure of "perf_record_opts".

struct perf_record_opts {
        struct perf_target target;
        bool         call_graph;
        bool         group;
        bool         inherit_stat;
        bool         no_delay;
        bool         no_inherit;
        bool         no_samples;
        bool         pipe_output;
        bool         raw_samples;
        bool         sample_address;
        bool         sample_time;
        bool         sample_id_all_missing;
        bool         exclude_guest_missing;
        bool         period;
        unsigned int freq;
        unsigned int mmap_pages;
        unsigned int user_freq;
        int          branch_stack;
        u64          default_interval;
        u64          user_interval;
};

static int
parse_branch_stack(const struct option *opt, const char *str, int unset)
{
#define ONLY_PLM \
        (PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER        |\
         PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL      |\
         PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HV)

        uint64_t *mode = (uint64_t *)opt->value;
--
Regards
Anshuman Khandual


             reply	other threads:[~2012-05-24  9:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-24  9:21 Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2012-05-25  5:27 ` perf record: why we used type casting of (uint64_t *) instead of int Anshuman Khandual
2012-05-25  8:03   ` [PATCH] perf record: Fixing record option data type in parse_branch_stack Anshuman Khandual
2012-05-25  8:44     ` Stephane Eranian
2012-05-25 10:32       ` Anshuman Khandual
2012-05-25 14:47         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-25  8:20   ` perf record: why we used type casting of (uint64_t *) instead of int Stephane Eranian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FBDFDA6.5010304@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox