From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com, borislav.petkov@amd.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, luto@mit.edu, jbeulich@suse.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
akinobu.mita@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/tlb: replace INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTOR by CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 16:40:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC72E94.2080107@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FC47DFE.8020004@intel.com>
>
>
> How about the following new comments? I changed them to match latest
> switch_mm and tlbflush code.
> but as to the 'The interrupt must handle 2 special cases' section, I am
> wondering if it should be kept, since current tlb flush IPI handler
> don't need %%esp at all.
>
> Comments welcome!
If no further comments here, I am going to use the following comments.
Actually, all of them are useful for full view of code.
I will refresh whole patcheset on 3.5-rc1 kernel. Thanks!
>
> -------
> /*
> * The flush IPI assumes that a thread switch happens in this order:
> * [cpu0: the cpu that switches]
> * 1) switch_mm() either 1a) or 1b)
> * 1a) thread switch to a different mm
> * 1a1) set cpu_tlbstate to TLBSTATE_OK
> * Now the tlb flush IPI handler flush_tlb_func won't call leave_mm
> * if cpu0 was in lazy tlb mode.
> * 1a2) update cpu active_mm
> * Now cpu0 accepts tlb flushes for the new mm.
> * 1a3) cpu_set(cpu, new_mm->cpu_vm_mask);
> * Now the other cpus will send tlb flush ipis.
> * 1a4) change cr3.
> * 1a5) cpu_clear(cpu, old_mm->cpu_vm_mask);
> * Stop ipi delivery for the old mm. This is not synchronized with
> * the other cpus, but flush_tlb_func ignore flush ipis for the wrong
> * mm, and in the worst case we perform a superfluous tlb flush.
> * 1b) thread switch without mm change
> * cpu active_mm is correct, cpu0 already handles
> * flush ipis.
> * 1b1) set cpu_tlbstate to TLBSTATE_OK
> * 1b2) test_and_set the cpu bit in cpu_vm_mask.
> * Atomically set the bit [other cpus will start sending flush ipis],
> * and test the bit.
> * 1b3) if the bit was 0: leave_mm was called, flush the tlb.
> * 2) switch %%esp, ie current
> *
> * The interrupt must handle 2 special cases:
> * - cr3 is changed before %%esp, ie. it cannot use current->{active_,}mm.
> * - the cpu performs speculative tlb reads, i.e. even if the cpu only
> * runs in kernel space, the cpu could load tlb entries for user space
> * pages.
> *
> * The good news is that cpu_tlbstate is local to each cpu, no
> * write/read ordering problems.
> */
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-31 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-18 15:12 [PATCH] x86/tlb: replace INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTOR by CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR Alex Shi
2012-05-19 2:07 ` Alex Shi
2012-05-22 0:16 ` Alex Shi
2012-05-25 14:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-29 7:42 ` Alex Shi
2012-05-31 8:40 ` Alex Shi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FC72E94.2080107@intel.com \
--to=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@mit.edu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).