From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86: Reset the debug_stack update counter
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 12:19:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC7C43B.3070106@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120531020441.165841749@goodmis.org>
On 05/30/2012 06:28 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c index
> 9087527..c1fffc5 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c +++
> b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c @@ -450,8 +450,10 @@ static inline void
> nmi_nesting_preprocess(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> static inline void nmi_nesting_postprocess(void) { - if
> (unlikely(__get_cpu_var(update_debug_stack))) + if
> (unlikely(__get_cpu_var(update_debug_stack))) {
> debug_stack_reset(); + __get_cpu_var(update_debug_stack) = 0; + }
> } #endif
>
Please don't use __get_cpu_var(); it causes a pointer to be manifest,
which is free or almost free on most architectures but quite expensive
on x86.
Instead use this_cpu_read()/this_cpu_write().
Consider:
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/percpu.h>
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, percpu_test);
int read_foo(void)
{
return __get_cpu_var(percpu_test);
}
void write_foo(int x)
{
__get_cpu_var(percpu_test) = x;
}
int read_bar(void)
{
return this_cpu_read(percpu_test);
}
void write_bar(int x)
{
this_cpu_write(percpu_test, x);
}
... and the corresponding assembly code (with gcc boilerplate removed):
read_foo:
movq $percpu_test, %rax #, tcp_ptr__
add %gs:this_cpu_off, %rax # this_cpu_off, tcp_ptr__
movl (%rax), %eax # *D.8429_3, *D.8429_3
ret
write_foo:
movq $percpu_test, %rax #, tcp_ptr__
add %gs:this_cpu_off, %rax # this_cpu_off, tcp_ptr__
movl %edi, (%rax) # x, *D.8435_3
ret
read_bar:
movl %gs:percpu_test,%eax # percpu_test, pfo_ret__
write_bar:
movl %edi,%gs:percpu_test # x, percpu_test
ret
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-31 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-31 1:28 [PATCH 0/5] [GIT PULL] ftrace: Fix bug with function tracing and lockdep Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 1:28 ` [PATCH 1/5] ftrace: Synchronize variable setting with breakpoints Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 11:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 14:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 15:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-05-31 15:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 17:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 18:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 17:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 17:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 17:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 18:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 18:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 19:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 19:55 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-05-31 20:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 20:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 20:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 20:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 20:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 20:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-06-01 4:53 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-06-01 11:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-06-01 12:52 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-06-01 0:45 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-31 1:28 ` [PATCH 2/5] ftrace: Use breakpoint method to update ftrace caller Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 11:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 14:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 1:28 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: Reset the debug_stack update counter Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 19:19 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2012-05-31 19:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 1:28 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow nesting of the debug stack IDT setting Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 18:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-31 18:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-31 19:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 19:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-31 20:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 20:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-31 20:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 20:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-31 20:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 21:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-31 21:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 21:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-06-01 2:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 1:28 ` [PATCH 5/5] ftrace/x86: Do not change stacks in DEBUG when calling lockdep Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 2:13 ` [PATCH 0/5] (for 3.5)[GIT PULL] ftrace: Fix bug with function tracing and lockdep Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FC7C43B.3070106@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox