From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: Asai Thambi S P <asamymuthupa@micron.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sam Bradshaw <sbradshaw@micron.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] mtip32xx: Set block queue boundary variables
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 08:01:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC85AC9.8010707@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49hauwb3e1.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
On 05/31/2012 08:40 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>>>>>> @@ -3631,7 +3631,11 @@ skip_create_disk:
>>>>>> set_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT, &dd->queue->queue_flags);
>>>>>> blk_queue_max_segments(dd->queue, MTIP_MAX_SG);
>>>>>> blk_queue_physical_block_size(dd->queue, 4096);
>>>>>> + blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(dd->queue, 0xffff);
>>>>>> + blk_queue_max_segment_size(dd->queue, 0x400000);
>>>>>> blk_queue_io_min(dd->queue, 4096);
>>>>>> + dd->queue->nr_requests = 255;
>>>>>
>>>>> ->nr_requests isn't a boundary variable you set for the queue. It's set
>>>>> by the core bits, or by the user via the sysfs interface.
>>>>>
>>>>> So you should not touch that from the driver.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ok.
>>>>
>>>> I saw scsi lib module changing it, so thought of changing the value close to
>>>> device queue depth.
>>>
>>> That's actually a fair point. What is the device queue depth for this
>>> card?
>>>
>> 256
>
> Jens, I actually think changing nr_requests makes sense; the only
> question in my mind is where to do it. (There's no point in artificially
> limiting the device by default.) IIRC, your general rule was to set this
> value to 2x the device's queue depth. So, given that this driver
> doesn't use the blk-tag interfaces, what do you think would be the
> cleanest way to bump nr_requests in this (and the more general) case?
But it doesn't matter for this case, the driver isn't consuming request
structures, hence the value set doesn't make any difference. So the only
limiter of queue depth is the driver itself.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-01 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-30 1:42 [PATCH 05/11] mtip32xx: Set block queue boundary variables Asai Thambi S P
2012-05-31 6:43 ` Jens Axboe
2012-05-31 15:56 ` Asai Thambi S P
2012-05-31 17:12 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-05-31 18:12 ` Asai Thambi S P
2012-05-31 18:40 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-06-01 6:01 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2012-06-01 13:11 ` Jeff Moyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FC85AC9.8010707@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=asamymuthupa@micron.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sbradshaw@micron.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox