From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759810Ab2FANYk (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jun 2012 09:24:40 -0400 Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:35017 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753381Ab2FANYj (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jun 2012 09:24:39 -0400 Message-ID: <4FC8C288.5060200@ti.com> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 15:24:24 +0200 From: "Cousson, Benoit" Organization: Texas Instruments User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY" CC: "Shilimkar, Santosh" , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] arm: omap: remove ocp2scp_usb_phy_ick clock node References: <1338375394-16268-1-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com> <1338375394-16268-3-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com> <4FC63B8D.3070107@ti.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/1/2012 2:52 PM, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote: > Hi Benoit, > > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote: >> On 5/30/2012 4:51 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> "ocp2scp_usb_phy_ick" clock node was a fake clock node created >>>> to control MODULEMODE of ocp2scp. Since the hwmod for ocp2scp is now >>>> added >>>> (which can be used to control MODULEMODE) this clock node is removed. >>>> >>>> Cc: Benoit Cousson >>>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c | 11 ----------- >>> >>> >>> Have you patched clock44xx_data.c manually or you have a patch for >>> the clock_data autogen script to generate it ? >> >> >> I have a series that will remove all these clock nodes. I should be able to >> post that soon. >> >> Potentially at that time, Kishon might be able to drop that patch. > > Will you be sending a patch for *[RFC PATCH 1/5] arm: omap: hwmod: > make *phy_48m* as the main_clk of ocp2scp* also or I have to keep that > as part of my series? Good point. In fact, I'm fixing both at the same time to avoid any bisect issue. Regards, Benoit