From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964980Ab2FBFu4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jun 2012 01:50:56 -0400 Received: from mail-qa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:57167 "EHLO mail-qa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933784Ab2FBFuy (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jun 2012 01:50:54 -0400 Message-ID: <4FC9A9BA.1020904@kernel.org> Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 01:50:50 -0400 From: Len Brown User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120424 Thunderbird/12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Colin Cross CC: Kevin Hilman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Amit Kucheria , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Arjan van de Ven , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/2] bug fixes for coupled cpuidle References: <1337364324-12171-1-git-send-email-ccross@android.com> In-Reply-To: <1337364324-12171-1-git-send-email-ccross@android.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/18/2012 02:05 PM, Colin Cross wrote: > The last modifications made to the coupled cpuidle patches introduced > two bugs that I missed during testing. The online count was never > initialized, causing coupled idle to always wait and never enter the > ready loop. That hid the second bug, the ready count could never be > decremented after exiting idle. > > Len, these two patches could be squashed into patch 3 of the original > set. If you do squash them, you could also add Rafael's tags to the > set (Reviewed-by on 1 and 2, acked-by on 3). squash & tags update done. > Or I can reupload the > whole stack as v5 if you prefer. no need. thanks, -Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center