From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754133Ab2FGAf0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2012 20:35:26 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:3077 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751932Ab2FGAfX (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2012 20:35:23 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="175750030" Message-ID: <4FCFF6D8.70507@intel.com> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 08:33:28 +0800 From: Alex Shi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Zijlstra CC: anton@samba.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, cmetcalf@tilera.com, dhowells@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, fenghua.yu@intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, mattst88@gmail.com, paulus@samba.org, lethal@linux-sh.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, rth@twiddle.net, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, x86@kernel.org, sivanich@sgi.com, greg.pearson@hp.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, bob.picco@oracle.com, chris.mason@oracle.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org, pjt@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com, ak@linux.intel.com, arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched/numa: do load balance between remote nodes References: <1338965571-9812-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> <1338973295.2749.81.camel@twins> In-Reply-To: <1338973295.2749.81.camel@twins> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/06/2012 05:01 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 14:52 +0800, Alex Shi wrote: >> - if (sched_domains_numa_distance[level] > REMOTE_DISTANCE) >> + if (sched_domains_numa_distance[level] > RECLAIM_DISTANCE) > > I actually considered this.. I just felt a little uneasy re-purposing > the RECLAIM_DISTANCE for this, but I guess its all the same anyway. Both > mean expensive-away-distance. > I understand you, the BIOS guys don't have a good alignment with us on this. > So I've taken this. > > thanks!