From: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: rob@landley.net, tglx@linutronix.de,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
bhelgaas@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] x86: add max_addr boot option
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:26:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD6E101.3010106@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FD65FD4.4060705@zytor.com>
At 06/12/2012 05:15 AM, H. Peter Anvin Wrote:
> On 06/11/2012 01:44 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> Currently, the boot option max_addr is only supported on ia64 platform.
>> We also need it on x86 platform.
>> For example:
>> There are two nodes:
>> NODE#0 address range 0x00000000 00000000 - 0x00010000 00000000
>> NODE#1 address range 0x00010000 00000000 - 0x00020000 00000000
>> If we only want to use node0, we can specify the max_addr. The boot
>> option "mem=" can do the same thing now. But the boot option "mem="
>> means the total memory used by the system. If we tell the user
>> that the boot option "mem=" can do this, it will confuse the user.
>> So we need an new boot option "max_addr" on x86 platform.
>>
>
> I fail to see what this does that cannot be done with the
> since-long-existing memmap= option. Could you address why memmap=
> doesn't match your needs?
The memmap= option is very diffcult to use. The end user should know the memory
map in the system. The end user can get the max address of NODE#0, but he
may not know the memory map for NODE#0. If the end user give the wrong memory
map, the kernel can not boot. For example: I add memmap=16G@0 in the kernel
parameter, and the kernel cannot boot. The max_addr is more easier to use.
Thanks
Wen Congyang
>
> -hpa
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-12 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-11 8:44 [PATCH 1/2 v2] x86: add max_addr boot option Wen Congyang
2012-06-11 8:46 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] x86: reimplement mem " Wen Congyang
2012-06-11 17:35 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] x86: add max_addr " Bjorn Helgaas
2012-06-12 6:29 ` Wen Congyang
2012-06-12 11:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-06-13 1:55 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-06-13 4:59 ` Rob Landley
2012-06-14 2:06 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-06-14 20:00 ` Rob Landley
2012-06-11 21:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-12 6:26 ` Wen Congyang [this message]
2012-06-12 16:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-13 2:21 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-06-13 3:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-13 5:20 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-06-13 5:36 ` Wen Congyang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FD6E101.3010106@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox