From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753158Ab2FLVh2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jun 2012 17:37:28 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:46072 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752040Ab2FLVh0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jun 2012 17:37:26 -0400 Message-ID: <4FD7B68F.9010000@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:37:19 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brandon Falk CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [question] x86/x86_64 boot process References: <4FD7AF24.8080607@zytor.com> <4FD7B1AB.6030708@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/12/2012 02:33 PM, Brandon Falk wrote: > Would it be reasonable to put the setup code at 0x7c00 (given that I > can fit my boot loader in the space before the kernel header)? Should work. -hpa