From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756563Ab2FNUtF (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2012 16:49:05 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:38102 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754352Ab2FNUtD (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2012 16:49:03 -0400 Message-ID: <4FDA4E2E.7030503@zytor.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:48:46 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Suresh Siddha CC: Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Hans Rosenfeld , linux-kernel , tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [RFC] x86, fpu: unify signal handling code paths for x86 and x86_64 kernels References: <1339545814.28766.148.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1339545814.28766.148.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/12/2012 05:03 PM, Suresh Siddha wrote: > I can split the patch if needed. And I need to do little bit more > validation (already tested on 64-bit IVB and 32-bit NHM) before > removing the 'RFC' tag. > > I tried starting with the old version of Hans patch. But there were lot > more changes in this area since then and also his patch had few > user-visible compatibility issues. > > Appended is the version that I came up with. Please review. > This patch doesn't apply to v3.5-rc2. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.