From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: <mingo@kernel.org>, <pjt@google.com>, <venki@google.com>,
<efault@gmx.de>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/4] sched: Push put_prev_task() into pick_next_task()
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:49:03 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FDB050F.7040503@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120614133212.690691207@chello.nl>
On 06/14/2012 05:29 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> +static struct task_struct *
> +pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
> {
> - struct task_struct *p = _pick_next_task_rt(rq);
> + struct task_struct *p;
> + struct rt_rq *rt_rq =&rq->rt;
> +
> + if (!rt_rq->rt_nr_running)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (rt_rq_throttled(rt_rq))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (prev)
> + prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev);
> +
it might be me, but this one sounds strange. If the responsibility of
putting the task now lays with pic_next_task, you can't return NULL
without doing this first.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-15 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-14 13:29 [RFC][PATCH 0/4] sched: Optimize cgroup muck Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-14 13:29 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] sched/fair: track cgroup depth Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-14 13:29 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] sched: Push put_prev_task() into pick_next_task() Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-14 14:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-06-14 14:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-15 9:49 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2012-06-15 10:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-15 10:01 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-21 7:35 ` Michael Wang
2012-06-21 8:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-21 9:23 ` Michael Wang
2012-06-14 13:29 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] sched/fair: clean up __clear_buddies_* Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-14 13:29 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] sched/fair: Optimize cgroup pick_next_task_fair Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-14 21:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-15 14:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-19 8:45 ` Paul Turner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FDB050F.7040503@parallels.com \
--to=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=venki@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox