public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
To: Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya.rohm@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>,
	Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] pch_uart: Add eg20t_port lock field, avoid recursive spinlocks
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:41:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FDFA09A.4030405@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANKRQnj5mxHLprMt4VMMa7sCwLZb=PAktnVVD1MZVkkUG4eLoA@mail.gmail.com>



On 06/05/2012 04:48 PM, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> Are there still concerns about the additional lock? I'll resend V2
>> tomorrow with the single whitespace fix if I don't hear anything back today.
> 
> I understand your saying. Looks good.
> However, I am not expert of linux-uart core system.
> So, I'd like UART maintainer to give us your opinion.

Greg, Alan,

any concerns with the locking approach I've adopted in the patch?

Thanks,

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel



  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-18 21:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-31  8:54 [RFC PATCH] pch_uart: Add eg20t_port lock field, avoid recursive spinlocks Darren Hart
2012-06-01  8:30 ` Tomoya MORINAGA
2012-06-01 18:36   ` Darren Hart
2012-06-05 22:07     ` Darren Hart
2012-06-05 23:48       ` Tomoya MORINAGA
2012-06-18 21:41         ` Darren Hart [this message]
2012-06-18 22:21           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-06-19  9:14           ` Alan Cox
2012-06-19 17:35             ` Darren Hart
2012-06-19 17:54               ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FDFA09A.4030405@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tomoya.rohm@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox