RE: [PATCH] sched: Folding nohz load accounting more accurate

Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-13T21:57:44Z

On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 08:33 -0700, Doug Smythies wrote:
>
> All that being said, what I typically do with a new code test is:
>
> . select a known, previous bad operating point. For example 2
> processes, actual load average 0.30 (0.15 for each process) currently
> reporting ~1.5.

OK, I'll try and apply this. Waiting 63 hours for feedback on patches is
something I'm not patient enough for.

Would this be:

./waiter 2 900 230608 10000

I haven't even bothered reading the waiter proglet yet, but I did notice
the 'help' provided when started without arguments doesn't seem to
actually match what load_180 does.