From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757237Ab2FTQ0P (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:26:15 -0400 Received: from avon.wwwdotorg.org ([70.85.31.133]:44176 "EHLO avon.wwwdotorg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756928Ab2FTQ0N (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:26:13 -0400 Message-ID: <4FE1F9A0.6080200@wwwdotorg.org> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:26:08 -0600 From: Stephen Warren User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Laxman Dewangan CC: khali@linux-fr.org, w.sang@pengutronix.de, swarren@nvidia.com, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pgaikwad@nvidia.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: tegra: use clk_disable_unprepare in place of clk_disable References: <1340196960-3002-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> In-Reply-To: <1340196960-3002-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/20/2012 06:56 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > Use clk_disable_unprepare() inplace of clk_disable(). > This was missed as part of moving clock enable/disable to > prepare/unprepare for using the common clock framework. Wolfram, Since I've taken the other I2C patch on this topic through the Tegra tree (in order to satisfy any common clock dependencies there), I believe I should take this one patch through the Tegra tree too. I see no reason not to take the second patch in the series through the I2C tree though. Do you agree?