linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Muthu Kumar <muthu.lkml@gmail.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Jej B <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED] block: In blk_execute_rq_nowait, init rq->end_io before checking for dead queue.
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:53:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE21C15.6040409@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120618224253.GH32733@google.com>

On 06/18/12 22:42, Tejun Heo wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 02:23:23PM -0700, Muthu Kumar wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Muthu Kumar <muthu.lkml@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> wrote:
>>>> On 06/09/12 23:57, Muthu Kumar wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Locking change is the one you posted already (the link above). Anyway,
>>>>> I have the attached patch *including* the locking change. Original
>>>>> mail has attachment without locking change. Please use whatever you
>>>>> need.
>>>>
>>>> While we are at it ... the rq->rq_disk and rq->end_io assignments can be
>>>> performed safely before the spinlock is taken, isn't it ?
>>>
>>> Yes.. that spinlock is to protect the q.
>>
>> Attached patch with assignment performed before taking the spinlock.
> 
> This looks correct to me.  Bart, can you please include this patch in
> your series and repost the series?


I'll start testing the patch below:

[PATCH] block: Fix blk_execute_rq_nowait() dead queue handling

Make sure that blk_execute_rq_nowait() invokes the proper end_io
function if the queue is dead and also that this call is performed
with the queue lock held. Found this through source code review.

Notes:
- Since blk_execute_rq_nowait() must not be invoked from interrupt
  context it is safe to invoke end_io directly from this function.
- blk_finish_request() already invokes request.end_io with the
  queue lock held.

Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Reported-by: Muthukumar Ratty <muthur@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 block/blk-exec.c |   11 +++++++----
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-exec.c b/block/blk-exec.c
index fb2cbd5..c0fd83a 100644
--- a/block/blk-exec.c
+++ b/block/blk-exec.c
@@ -42,7 +42,8 @@ static void blk_end_sync_rq(struct request *rq, int error)
  *
  * Description:
  *    Insert a fully prepared request at the back of the I/O scheduler queue
- *    for execution.  Don't wait for completion.
+ *    for execution.  Don't wait for completion.  This function may invoke
+ *    rq->end_io directly.
  */
 void blk_execute_rq_nowait(struct request_queue *q, struct gendisk *bd_disk,
 			   struct request *rq, int at_head,
@@ -51,18 +52,20 @@ void blk_execute_rq_nowait(struct request_queue *q, struct gendisk *bd_disk,
 	int where = at_head ? ELEVATOR_INSERT_FRONT : ELEVATOR_INSERT_BACK;
 
 	WARN_ON(irqs_disabled());
+
+	rq->rq_disk = bd_disk;
+	rq->end_io = done;
+
 	spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
 
 	if (unlikely(blk_queue_dead(q))) {
-		spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
 		rq->errors = -ENXIO;
 		if (rq->end_io)
 			rq->end_io(rq, rq->errors);
+		spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
 		return;
 	}
 
-	rq->rq_disk = bd_disk;
-	rq->end_io = done;
 	__elv_add_request(q, rq, where);
 	__blk_run_queue(q);
 	/* the queue is stopped so it won't be run */
-- 
1.7.7



  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-20 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-09  0:10 [PATCH UPDATED] block: In blk_execute_rq_nowait, init rq->end_io before checking for dead queue Muthu Kumar
2012-06-09 12:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-06-09 23:57   ` Muthu Kumar
2012-06-10 17:40     ` Bart Van Assche
2012-06-11 17:33       ` Muthu Kumar
2012-06-11 21:23         ` Muthu Kumar
2012-06-18 22:42           ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-20 18:53             ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2012-06-21  0:53               ` Muthu Kumar
2012-06-21  0:56                 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-21  5:40                 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-06-21 21:40                   ` Muthu Kumar
2012-06-22  7:20                     ` Bart Van Assche
2012-06-22 18:05                       ` Muthu Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FE21C15.6040409@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=muthu.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).