linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Muthu Kumar <muthu.lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Jej B <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED] block: In blk_execute_rq_nowait, init rq->end_io before checking for dead queue.
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 05:40:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE2B3D1.6070504@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFR8ueeFcnMCqG=A1im09crBNckgfPixsCz9oceQCpPeJ3wiNw@mail.gmail.com>

On 06/21/12 00:53, Muthu Kumar wrote:

> Hmm... Shouldn't this be:
> 
> Signed-off-by: Muthukumar Ratty <muthur@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>


I'll modify that part of the patch if you prefer to be mentioned as the
author. I hadn't done that because you hadn't posted the patch in its
entirety yet.

 
> This part already went in, its here only for testing - So in the final
> patch, before applying this should be removed.


When did it go in ? As far as I can see that patch is not yet present in
Linus' tree nor in James' tree.

Bart.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-06-21  5:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-09  0:10 [PATCH UPDATED] block: In blk_execute_rq_nowait, init rq->end_io before checking for dead queue Muthu Kumar
2012-06-09 12:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-06-09 23:57   ` Muthu Kumar
2012-06-10 17:40     ` Bart Van Assche
2012-06-11 17:33       ` Muthu Kumar
2012-06-11 21:23         ` Muthu Kumar
2012-06-18 22:42           ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-20 18:53             ` Bart Van Assche
2012-06-21  0:53               ` Muthu Kumar
2012-06-21  0:56                 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-21  5:40                 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2012-06-21 21:40                   ` Muthu Kumar
2012-06-22  7:20                     ` Bart Van Assche
2012-06-22 18:05                       ` Muthu Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FE2B3D1.6070504@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=muthu.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).