From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933175Ab2FVVKb (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:10:31 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:42465 "EHLO mail-wg0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932098Ab2FVVK3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:10:29 -0400 Message-ID: <4FE4DF41.30400@suse.cz> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 23:10:25 +0200 From: Jiri Slaby User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120610 Thunderbird/15.0a2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, lwn@lwn.net, Willy Tarreau , Bjorn Helgaas , Jesse Barnes Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.32.55 References: <20120125223434.GA31647@kroah.com> <4FE4C1A3.4080804@suse.cz> <20120622193824.GA3371@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20120622193824.GA3371@kroah.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/22/2012 09:38 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:04:03PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> On 01/25/2012 11:34 PM, Greg KH wrote: >>> I'm announcing the release of the 2.6.32.55 kernel. >> ... >>> Bjorn Helgaas (1): PNP: work around Dell 1536/1546 BIOS MMCONFIG >>> bug that breaks USB >> >> Hi, this one is dependant on 24d25dbfa63c3 (x86/PCI: amd: factor out >> MMCONFIG discovery), otherwise amd_get_mmconfig_range is undefined... > > Interesting that this was reported almost 6 months after it was released :) Yes :). This is because it is inside #ifdef CONFIG_AMD_NB which perhaps nobody has set in 2.6.32. (Other than that we have the kernel in suse enterprise for some time already.) @Willy: 24d25dbfa63c3 is not enough. The header referenced in 2.6.32.55's patch does not exist in that tree yet. It was renamed from asm/k8.h to asm/amd_nb.h later (by 23ac4ae827e62). Given nobody noticed till now, I would incline to drop that patch from 2.6.32 series. Opinions? > Anyway, I'm no longer handling 2.6.32 kernel stuff anymore, so there's > nothing I can do here, sorry. Yeah, I see, I replied to the announcement and added Willy. Your email was @ suse, so you should have not received a copy anyway :). thanks, -- js suse labs