From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Srikar <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
chegu_vinod@hp.com, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: handle last_boosted_vcpu = 0 case
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 00:04:41 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE60C41.5020907@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FE4DCEA.1050701@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 06/23/2012 02:30 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> On 06/22/2012 08:41 PM, Andrew Jones wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 04:56:08PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>>> Here are the results from kernbench.
>>>
>>> PS: I think we have to only take that, both the patches perform better,
>>> than reading into actual numbers since I am seeing more variance in
>>> especially 3x. may be I can test with some more stable benchmark if
>>> somebody points
>>>
[...]
> can we agree like, for kernbench 1x= -j (2*#vcpu) in 1 vm.
> 1.5x = -j (2*#vcpu) in 1 vm and -j (#vcpu) in other.. and so on.
> also a SPIN_THRESHOLD of 4k?
Please forget about 1.5x above. I am not too sure on that.
>
> Any ideas on benchmarks is welcome from all.
>
My run for other benchmarks did not have Rik's patches, so re-spinning
everything with that now.
Here is the detailed info on env and benchmark I am currently trying.
Let me know if you have any comments
=======
kernel 3.5.0-rc1 with Rik's Ple handler fix as base
Machine : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X7560 @ 2.27GHz, 4 numa node, 256GB RAM,
32 core machine
Host: enterprise linux gcc version 4.4.6 20120305 (Red Hat 4.4.6-4)
(GCC) with test kernels
Guest: fedora 16 with different built-in kernel from same source tree.
32 vcpus 8GB memory. (configs not changed with patches except for
CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCK)
Note: for Pv patches, SPIN_THRESHOLD is set to 4k
Benchmarks:
1) kernbench: kernbench-0.50
cmd:
echo "3" > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
ccache -C
kernbench -f -H -M -o 2*vcpu
Very first run in kernbench is omitted.
2) dbench: dbench version 4.00
cmd: dbench --warmup=30 -t 120 2*vcpu
3) hackbench:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/files?package=hackbench&project=benchmark
hackbench.c modified with loops=10000
used hackbench with num-threads = 2* vcpu
4) Specjbb: specjbb2000-1.02
Input Properties:
ramp_up_seconds = 30
measurement_seconds = 120
forcegc = true
starting_number_warehouses = 1
increment_number_warehouses = 1
ending_number_warehouses = 8
5) sysbench: 0.4.12
sysbench --test=oltp --db-driver=pgsql prepare
sysbench --num-threads=2*vcpu --max-requests=100000 --test=oltp
--oltp-table-size=500000 --db-driver=pgsql --oltp-read-only run
Note that driver for this pgsql.
6) ebizzy: release 0.3
cmd: ebizzy -S 120
- specjbb ran for 1x and 2x others mostly for 1x, 2x, 3x overcommit.
- overcommit of 2x means same benchmark running on 2 guests.
- sample for each overcommit is mostly 8
Note: I ran kernbench with old kernbench0.50, may be I can try kcbench
with ramfs if necessary
will soon come with detailed results
> - Raghu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-23 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-19 20:20 Regarding improving ple handler (vcpu_on_spin) Raghavendra K T
2012-06-19 20:51 ` [PATCH] kvm: handle last_boosted_vcpu = 0 case Rik van Riel
2012-06-20 20:12 ` Raghavendra K T
2012-06-21 2:11 ` Rik van Riel
2012-06-21 11:26 ` Raghavendra K T
2012-06-22 15:11 ` Andrew Jones
2012-06-22 21:00 ` Raghavendra K T
2012-06-23 18:34 ` Raghavendra K T [this message]
2012-06-27 20:27 ` Raghavendra K T
2012-06-27 20:29 ` [PATCH] kvm: handle last_boosted_vcpu = 0 case with benchmark detail attachment Raghavendra K T
2012-06-28 16:00 ` [PATCH] kvm: handle last_boosted_vcpu = 0 case Andrew Jones
2012-06-28 16:22 ` Raghavendra K T
2012-06-28 22:55 ` Vinod, Chegu
2012-07-02 14:49 ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-03 3:30 ` Raghavendra K T
2012-07-05 14:45 ` Andrew Theurer
2012-06-21 6:43 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-06-21 10:23 ` Raghavendra K T
2012-06-28 2:14 ` Raghavendra K T
2012-07-06 17:11 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FE60C41.5020907@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).