public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Lange <thomas@corelatus.se>
To: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [BUG] sched: clock wrap bug in 2.6.35-stable kills scheduling
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 19:32:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE74F1B.6070803@corelatus.se> (raw)

Commit 305e683 introduced a wrap bug that causes task scheduling to fail
after sched_clock() wrap. On a 1000 HZ system with 32bit jiffies, this
occurs after 49.7 days.

Bug was introduced in 2.6.35.12 and is still present in linux-2.6.35.y HEAD.

Symptoms include one task getting all available cpu time while others get
_none_. Setting niceness seems to make things even worse. Running this code
in a new process after wrap completely lock up user space, thus triggering a
watchdog reboot:
{ nice(1); while(1); }

To reproduce bug in reasonable time, one can up HZ. With 16000 HZ, bug occurs
after 3.1 days.
Modifying sched_clock() to wrap when jiffies does triggers bug after 5 mins.

The basic problem seems to be that rq->clock_task get stuck forever with a
really high value when rq->clock starts over from 0.

This fix solves that problem:

diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index d40d662..883448f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -657,6 +657,8 @@ inline void update_rq_clock(struct rq *rq)
        if (!rq->skip_clock_update)
                rq->clock = sched_clock_cpu(cpu_of(rq));
        irq_time = irq_time_cpu(cpu);
+       if (rq->clock < rq->clock_task)
+               rq->clock_task = 0;
        if (rq->clock - irq_time > rq->clock_task)
                rq->clock_task = rq->clock - irq_time;

I can create a proper patch if the above is acceptable.

A more appropriate solution would perhaps be to pull some additional sched
commits into stable branch, like fe44d62 and friends. I don't know enough
about scheduler internals to tell.

All tests were performed on mips32 systems, but all systems with 32bit
jiffies should be affected.

/Thomas

             reply	other threads:[~2012-06-24 17:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-24 17:32 Thomas Lange [this message]
2012-06-24 17:52 ` [BUG] sched: clock wrap bug in 2.6.35-stable kills scheduling Greg KH
2012-06-25  9:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-25 10:38   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-25 18:49     ` Thomas Lange
2012-06-25 19:33       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FE74F1B.6070803@corelatus.se \
    --to=thomas@corelatus.se \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox