From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@gmail.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>, Arun Sharma <asharma@fb.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] memcg: cleanup useless LRU_ALL_EVICTABLE
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:59:49 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE83695.6010007@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120625093328.GD19805@tiehlicka.suse.cz>
(2012/06/25 18:33), Michal Hocko wrote:
> Marking this patch as memcg is quite misleading. mm is more suitable.
>
> On Mon 25-06-12 16:43:32, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> From: Wanpeng Li <liwp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> Since LRU_ALL_EVICTABLE is useless, just remove it.
>
> It's really strange but I do not see any usage of this except for it's
> introduction. So agreed to remove it.
>
>> Add LRU_ALL_UNEVICTABLE to mask unevictable pages.
>
> Does it really make sense to introduce just for two uses in a single
> function?
>
I don't think so.
I doubt LRU_ALL_UNEVICTABLE implies there are other UNEVICTABLE LRUS
other than LRU_UNEVICTABLE.
For example, LRU_ALL_UNEVICTABLE means
if total_swap==0, UNEVICTABLE+ANON
if total_swap!=0, UNEVICTABLE,
This will have its own meanings...but I don't see there are any users.
Thanks,
-Kame
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-25 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-25 8:43 [PATCH v3 1/4] memcg: cleanup useless LRU_ALL_EVICTABLE Wanpeng Li
2012-06-25 9:33 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-25 9:59 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FE83695.6010007@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=asharma@fb.com \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liwp.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox