Re: [PATCH] pwm-backlight: add regulator and GPIO support

Alex Courbot
2012-07-05T07:41:37Z

On 07/05/2012 03:47 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>> I thought about just checking if devm_get_regulator returned -ENODEV
>> and happily continue if that was the case, assuming no regulator was
>> declared.
>
> And that's the problem. The get_regulator won't return -ENODEV. It will
> return -EPROBE_DEFER which tells you nothing about whether a regulator
> will ever be available or not.
>
> Having a flag in platform data would be fine with me, but I know other
> people think differently.
>
> BTW in devicetree this flag implicitely exists with the power-supply
> property.

One could actually question whether the whole regulator/gpio thing
should be supported at all with platform data. The platform interface
can use the function hooks in order to implement whatever behavior it
wants when the light needs to be powered on and off. The reason for
introducing optional regulator/gpio parameters is because the DT cannot
use these. Since I have no plan to remove these function hooks, making
the regulator/gpio option available in platform data might be redundant.
Any thought about this?

> Right now the regulator core will just return -EPROBE_DEFER in both
> cases. This could easily be changed in the regulator core.

Could this be because the regulator core cannot make the difference
between a not-yet-available regulator and a missing one?

Alex.