From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>, "lrg@ti.com" <lrg@ti.com>,
"broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com"
<broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>,
"perex@perex.cz" <perex@perex.cz>,
"clemens@ladisch.de" <clemens@ladisch.de>,
"alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ASoC: Move pcm writecombine dma buffer allocation to core
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:32:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FEDD8A3.8000608@metafoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5h1ukyw0pb.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
On 06/29/2012 06:18 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:06:52 +0200,
> Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>>
>> On 06/29/2012 05:04 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>
>>>> +/* allocate the coherent DMA pages */
>>>> +static void *snd_malloc_dev_pages(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>>>> dma_addr_t *dma)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return __snd_malloc_dev_pages(dev, size, dma, dma_alloc_coherent);
>>>
>>> This does not get compiled in ARM because dma_alloc_coherant is macro
>>> defined as
>>>
>>> #define dma_alloc_coherent(d, s, h, f) dma_alloc_attrs(d, s, h, f, NULL)
>>>
>>> static inline void *dma_alloc_attrs(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>>> dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t flag,
>>> struct dma_attrs *attrs)
>>>
>>>
>>> I fixed this by
>>> static void *_dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>>> dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t flag)
>>> {
>>> return dma_alloc_coherent(dev, size, dma_handle, flag);
>>> }
>>>
>>> /* allocate the coherent DMA pages */
>>> static void *snd_malloc_dev_pages(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>>> dma_addr_t *dma)
>>> {
>>> return _snd_malloc_dev_pages(dev, size, dma, _dma_alloc_coherent);
>>> }
>>
>> I think all dma_alloc_* functions use dma_alloc_attrs internally these days.
>> I think it might be a better idea just to use dma_alloc_attrs in
>> __snd_malloc_dev_pages and just pass a dma_attrs struct instead of a function.
>>
>> Something like:
>>
>> static void *__snd_malloc_dev_pages(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>> dma_addr_t *dma, struct dma_attrs *attrs)
>> {
>> ....
>> res = dma_alloc_attrs(dev, PAGE_SIZE << pg, dma, gfp_flags, attrs);
>> ....
>> }
>>
>>
>> static void *snd_malloc_dev_pages(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>> dma_addr_t *dma)
>> {
>> return __snd_malloc_dev_pages(dev, size, dma, NULL);
>> }
>>
>> static void *snd_malloc_dev_wc_pages(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>> dma_addr_t *dma)
>> {
>> DEFINE_DMA_ATTRS(attrs);
>> dma_set_attr(DMA_ATTR_WRITE_COMBINE, &attrs);
>>
>> return __snd_malloc_dev_pages(dev, size, dma, &attrs);
>> }
>>
>> Same applies for freeing the memory again.
>
> Yes, that'd be cleaner.
> But I prefer the code still workable on 3.5-base kernel, which makes
> easier to test and merge for 3.6, at first.
Actually that part is already in 3.5. But I've just had a closer look and it
looks as if even for 3.6 not all archs have been converted to
dma_alloc_attrs yet :/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-29 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-29 10:23 [PATCH 0/3] ASoC: Move pcm writecombine dma buffer allocation to core Laxman Dewangan
2012-06-29 10:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] ALSA: pcm: add apis for writecombine dma buffer allocation Laxman Dewangan
2012-06-29 10:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] ASoC: add apis for creating/free pcm dma buffer Laxman Dewangan
2012-06-29 10:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] ASoC: tegra: use core/pcm library for pcm buffer allocation Laxman Dewangan
2012-06-29 12:13 ` [PATCH 0/3] ASoC: Move pcm writecombine dma buffer allocation to core Takashi Iwai
2012-06-29 15:04 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-06-29 15:22 ` Takashi Iwai
2012-06-29 15:49 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-06-29 16:06 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-06-29 16:18 ` Takashi Iwai
2012-06-29 16:32 ` Lars-Peter Clausen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FEDD8A3.8000608@metafoo.de \
--to=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=clemens@ladisch.de \
--cc=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrg@ti.com \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=swarren@nvidia.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox