From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933154Ab2GBWOj (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jul 2012 18:14:39 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172]:49653 "EHLO mail-wi0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932997Ab2GBWOg (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jul 2012 18:14:36 -0400 Message-ID: <4FF21D48.50301@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 00:14:32 +0200 From: Daniel Lezcano User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" CC: Linus Walleij , Stephen Rothwell , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Lists Linaro-dev , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kevin Hilman , Peter De Schrijver , Amit Kucheria , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Colin Cross , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Rob Lee , "lenb@kernel.org" Subject: Re: linux-next : cpuidle - could you add my tree please References: <4FDEE98D.7010802@linaro.org> <4FF19947.3040608@linaro.org> <201207022149.36629.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <201207022149.36629.rjw@sisk.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/02/2012 09:49 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, July 02, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> >> On 07/02/2012 11:09 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Daniel Lezcano >>> wrote: >>> >>>> we discussed last week to put in place a tree grouping the cpuidle >>>> modifications [1]. Is it possible to add the tree ? >>>> >>>> git://git.linaro.org/people/dlezcano/cpuidle-next.git #cpuidle-next >>> >>> Thanks for doing this. >>> >>> Since MAINTAINERS is lacking a listed maintainer for cpuidle, >>> are you also going to add yourself as maintainer and list this >>> tree in that file, or is this a one-time exercise? >> >> I will be glad to do that if Len and Rafael agree on that. > > Len Brown has been a cpuidle maintainer for some time now. Moreover, > he's been taking patches, but Linus refused to pull his entire tree during the > last merge window (as you probably know). I honestly don't think this is > a good enough reason for replacing him as a cpuidle maintainer by force. > > So, you should ask Len whether or not he's willing to pass the cpuidle > maintenance to someone else. No, no. You are misunderstanding what I am proposing. I don't want to replace Len I just want to act as a "proxy". I understand a maintainer can be busy and could not have enough time to take care of the subsystem is maintaining during a period because he's too busy for that. Trust me, I fully understand that :) As there are a lot of modifications of cpuidle, I am proposing to take the patches when they are acked-by, to create a consolidated tree, providing a better integration for cpuidle, a wider testing, preventing conflicts and facilitating Len's work if he agrees to pull from this tree. If that makes sense to add myself to the MAINTAINER file as a co-maintainer (understand: send to me also the patches, so I can take care of them if Len does not respond), I am ok with that. It is just about helping :) > I know that Len hasn't been responsive recently, but I also know that he > _does_ respond to inquiries sent directly to him. Do you mean to its intel address ? Thanks -- Daniel > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog