linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: Fix recursive mutex lockdep warning
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 15:47:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF3769A.3090703@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120703224316.GB11368@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

On 07/03/12 15:43, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>> What do you think about removing the locking in get_voltage? Is that better?
> There's already an unlocked version of get_voltage()?

Yes, I'm suggesting we just use that unlocked version for all of the
code that gets the input voltage.

index ef07b62..4c63336 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ static void drms_uA_update(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
        /* get input voltage */
        input_uV = 0;
        if (rdev->supply)
-               input_uV = regulator_get_voltage(rdev->supply);
+               input_uV = _regulator_get_voltage(rdev->supply->rdev);
        if (input_uV <= 0)
                input_uV = rdev->constraints->input_uV;
        if (input_uV <= 0)
@@ -2582,7 +2582,7 @@ int regulator_set_optimum_mode(struct regulator *regulator, int uA_load)
        /* get input voltage */
        input_uV = 0;
        if (rdev->supply)
-               input_uV = regulator_get_voltage(rdev->supply);
+               input_uV = _regulator_get_voltage(rdev->supply->rdev);
        if (input_uV <= 0)
                input_uV = rdev->constraints->input_uV;
        if (input_uV <= 0) {


-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.


  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-03 22:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-03  2:21 [PATCH] regulator: Fix recursive mutex lockdep warning Stephen Boyd
2012-07-03 19:26 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-03 20:08   ` Stephen Boyd
2012-07-03 22:43     ` Mark Brown
2012-07-03 22:47       ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2012-07-03 23:06         ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FF3769A.3090703@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lrg@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).