Re: [PATCH] cgroup: fix panic in netprio_cgroup

Gao feng
2012-07-05T09:40:39Z

于 2012年07月05日 16:43, Eric Dumazet 写道:
> On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 16:31 +0800, Gao feng wrote:
>> we set max_prioidx to the first zero bit index of prioidx_map in
>> function get_prioidx.
>>
>> So when we delete the low index netprio cgroup and adding a new
>> netprio cgroup again,the max_prioidx will be set to the low index.
>>
>> when we set the high index cgroup's net_prio.ifpriomap,the function
>> write_priomap will call update_netdev_tables to alloc memory which
>> size is sizeof(struct netprio_map) + sizeof(u32) * (max_prioidx + 1),
>> so the size of array that map->priomap point to is max_prioidx +1,
>> which is low than what we actually need.
>>
>> fix this by adding check in get_prioidx,only set max_prioidx when
>> max_prioidx low than the new prioidx.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> net/core/netprio_cgroup.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c b/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c
>> index 5b8aa2f..586f7d9 100644
>> --- a/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c
>> +++ b/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c
>> @@ -50,7 +50,8 @@ static int get_prioidx(u32 *prio)
>> }
>> set_bit(prioidx, prioidx_map);
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&prioidx_map_lock, flags);
>> - atomic_set(&max_prioidx, prioidx);
>> + if (atomic_read(&max_prioidx) < prioidx)
>> + atomic_set(&max_prioidx, prioidx);
>> *prio = prioidx;
>> return 0;
>> }
>
> This is still racy.
>
> Please do this before the
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&prioidx_map_lock, flags);
>

Thanks Eric,you are right
I will fix and resent it.